LaseMD’s UltraGlo vs Traditional Acne Scar Treatments: Which Actually Works Better?

LaseMD for acne scars offers remarkable results that can end your frustrating search for the right treatment. This non-ablative fractional laser stands out from traditional treatments that keep you homebound for weeks. You’ll need just 24-48 hours to recover. The treatment takes only 30 minutes to an hour, which makes skin renewal possible even with packed schedules.

Your skin’s collagen production gets a boost as the LaseMD Ultra laser creates tiny microchannels. This natural healing process helps fade those stubborn acne scars effectively. The results start showing up within a week. Your skin continues to improve over several months as it regenerates naturally. The before and after photos show clear improvements in texture and tone. These results come without the extended downtime or discomfort you’d expect from conventional treatments. The LaseMD Ultra works safely on skin of all types, which makes it a great option for patients who can’t get more invasive procedures.

LaseMD Ultra vs Traditional Acne Scar Treatments: Key Differences

Knowing how to tell different laser treatments apart is vital if you have acne scar correction in mind. LaseMD Ultra’s technology stands out from traditional approaches in several ways.

Treatment Mechanism: Fractional vs Ablative Lasers

Traditional ablative lasers like CO2 and Er:YAG remove the epidermis completely and partially ablate the dermis. This triggers wound remodeling and gets more collagen production [1]. These lasers deliver intense thermal energy that vaporizes tissue with a depth of 20-30 µm for CO2 lasers [1]. LaseMD Ultra takes a different approach. It uses non-ablative fractional technology to create micro-channels in the skin without removing the top layer [2].

Traditional CO2 lasers cause much thermal injury. LaseMD Ultra encourages collagen production more gently [2]. CO2 lasers emit energy at 10,600 nm wavelength with strong water absorption [3]. LaseMD Ultra uses a 1927 nm thulium laser that targets precisely with less surrounding damage [4].

The biggest difference shows in how they interact with tissue. Ablative lasers destroy tissue to force regeneration. Non-ablative fractional lasers like LaseMD Ultra create controlled micro-injuries that heal without extensive damage [5].

Downtime and Recovery Comparison

Recovery time stands as one of the most important benefits of LaseMD Ultra over traditional treatments. Patients who get fractional CO2 laser treatment usually need about a week of downtime. They experience visible erythema, edema, and crust formation [1]. They must also avoid direct sunlight, wear loose clothing, and avoid strenuous activities during recovery [1].

LaseMD Ultra patients typically experience only:

  • Mild to moderate redness that looks like a sunburn
  • Minor swelling that goes away within 1-2 days
  • A sandpaper-like texture that clears as skin exfoliates [6]

LaseMD Ultra lets patients return to their normal activities right away. Full healing usually happens within 5-7 days [6]. Traditional ablative treatments need 2+ weeks of recovery. Patients deal with severe scabbing and cannot expose themselves to sun or physical activity [7].

Suitability for Different Skin Types

Traditional ablative lasers can be risky for darker skin tones (Fitzpatrick types IV-VI), especially when it comes to post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation [3]. Er:YAG lasers work better than CO2 lasers for these patients because they have a lower risk profile [3].

LaseMD Ultra works safely on all skin types and tones [8]. This universal compatibility comes from its non-ablative fractional technology. It minimizes the risk of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation even on darker skin tones [9]. Clinicians who treat patients in a variety of populations find this especially helpful. They can adjust treatment parameters based on individual needs rather than limiting options due to skin type [6].

How LaseMD Ultra Targets Acne Scars More Effectively

The science of LaseMD Ultra explains its excellence in acne scar treatment. Let’s explore how this non-ablative technology works and see its unique benefits for different scar types.

Collagen Stimulation and Skin Remodeling

LaseMD Ultra creates tiny micro-channels in the skin that trigger natural healing responses [10]. These microscopic injuries boost collagen production, which helps skin regeneration and damaged tissue healing. The controlled damage from the laser kicks off the body’s repair process and replaces damaged cells with healthy new ones [6].

LaseMD’s results are impressive because the laser can stimulate collagen at multiple skin depths [9]. This layered approach helps:

  • Fill in depressed acne scars over time
  • Smooth out uneven skin texture
  • Improve overall skin tone with new cell growth

The laser’s heat reshapes collagen in deeper skin layers, which improves texture substantially [6].

Precision in Treating Atrophic and Boxcar Scars

LaseMD Ultra works exceptionally well with atrophic scars – the depressed, pitted scars from collagen loss. The treatment reaches both surface and deeper skin layers [11] and promotes skin resurfacing through exact energy delivery.

The system’s fractional delivery tackles boxcar scars (with steep, defined edges) by reaching the exact depth needed without harming surrounding tissues. The precise and controlled energy delivery will give maximum results with minimal damage [11].

Minimal Risk of Post-Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation

Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) stands as one of the toughest side effects of traditional laser treatments [12]. This issue happens when melanocytes react to inflammation from thermal damage [12].

LaseMD Ultra’s safety advantage comes from its non-ablative nature and skin-friendly wavelength, which substantially reduces PIH risk [13]. The treatment works well even on melanin-rich skin – a huge benefit compared to traditional CO2 lasers that often cause pigmentation problems in darker skin tones [14].

Results show better scar appearance and improved overall skin quality without the PIH complications that come with aggressive treatments.

Real-World LaseMD Results: What Patients Are Seeing

Clinical evidence shows amazing results for patients who use LaseMD Ultra to treat acne scarring. My review of many before and after cases reveals patterns that explain why patients love this treatment option.

LaseMD Before and After: Visible Improvements

LaseMD’s effectiveness shines through documented before and after photos. Patients show clear improvements after just one treatment session [6]. High-density treatments lead to remarkable changes in:

  • Most important reduction in acne scar visibility
  • Smoother overall skin texture
  • Better skin tone and pigmentation balance
  • Increased skin tightness and radiance

These improvements show up within weeks of treatment and full results develop over time. Patients see changes just one week after their procedure [6]. The best results typically appear after 4-6 weeks.

Long-Term Skin Texture and Tone Improvements

LaseMD Ultra boosts collagen production which creates benefits that develop months after treatment. The skin regeneration from the fractional laser works beyond the original recovery period [15].

Patients notice texture improvements right away. Their skin undergoes structural changes that fill in depressed scars as collagen production increases over several months [2]. The treatment boosts cellular turnover which leads to ongoing improvements in skin brightness and evenness [2].

Patient Testimonials and Case Studies

Ground success stories verify LaseMD’s effectiveness. Sarah, a 29-year-old with stubborn acne scarring, achieved visibly smoother skin texture after LaseMD treatment [5]. She called the treatment “a game-changer” after struggling with scars that affected her confidence.

Emma sought treatment for hyperpigmentation among her acne scars. Her skin tone became more even with fewer sunspots after LaseMD Ultra sessions [5]. Patients often mention the minimal discomfort and quick recovery compared to more invasive options [7].

When Traditional Treatments Might Still Be Better

LaseMD Ultra shows great results for many acne scar patients, but traditional treatments still work better in some cases. My experience with scar treatments of all types has taught me that recommending the right alternatives makes a huge difference in how well patients heal.

Severe Scarring and Deep Tissue Damage

Traditional ablative treatments give better results for deep, severe acne scarring. Ablative CO2 lasers remain the gold standard to treat substantial acne scars because they precisely ablate scar tissue [16]. These lasers vaporize tissue at depths of 20-30 µm and create more dramatic collagen remodeling than non-ablative options.

Ice pick scars need a different approach. These deep, narrow indentations respond best to punch excision or punch replacement grafting [17]. My patients’ results show that these surgical approaches transform sharp, deep scars into smoother, less visible ones – something LaseMD Ultra can’t do for severe cases.

Budget Constraints and Accessibility

Money plays a big role in treatment decisions. Traditional treatments can be more budget-friendly:

  • Chemical peels cost less than laser sessions
  • Microneedling usually runs about $500 per treatment compared to pricier laser options [18]
  • CO2 laser treatments, though expensive at $1500+ per session [18], might need fewer sessions for severe scarring

Traditional treatments are also accessible to more people, especially in areas that don’t have the newest technology yet.

Combination Therapy with CO2 or Microneedling

The best approach often combines old and new methods. Research shows that radiofrequency microneedling with fractional CO2 laser treatment substantially improves acne scar severity, with recovery taking less than 7 days [19].

Microneedling with PRP (platelet-rich plasma) gets better patient satisfaction than microneedling by itself [20]. My experience shows these combination approaches work better for complex scarring patterns because different treatments target various aspects of scar formation at once.

The key to treating acne scars lies in customizing the approach based on scar type, severity, skin tone, and individual factors rather than using just one technology—even LaseMD Ultra.

Conclusion

The evidence shows LaseMD Ultra has clear advantages over many standard acne scar treatments. Most patients find it appealing because it needs little recovery time, works on all skin types, and shows steady improvement. This technology fills an important gap – patients no longer have to choose between good results and quick recovery.

That said, traditional methods still make sense in some cases. People with very deep scars might get better results from CO2 lasers or surgery. Chemical peels could be a more affordable choice for those watching their budget.

Your best treatment choice depends on your scar type, skin health, and what matters most to you. Some patients get the best outcome by mixing different approaches instead of sticking to just one. I take time to get a full picture of each patient’s situation before suggesting LaseMD Ultra or other options.

LaseMD Ultra marks a big step forward in treating acne scars. It gives great results without the long downtime or risks that come with stronger treatments. While no single treatment works perfectly for everyone, LaseMD Ultra has changed the game in acne scar care. It helps countless patients feel confident again without weeks of hiding at home or feeling uncomfortable. Best of all, people don’t have to live with acne scars anymore – they now have real solutions that work.

References

[1] – https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11069036/
[2] – https://www.pulselightclinic.co.uk/skin-treatments/lasemd-transform-your-skin-with-laser-technology
[3] – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557474/
[4] – https://theluxeeffect.com/our-services/lasemd-ultra/
[5] – https://confidencemedspa.com/lasemd-before-and-after/
[6] – https://northsidedermatology.com.au/procedure/esthetic-dermatology/laser/lasemd/
[7] – https://beautifulaesthetics.com/blogs/blog-post/the-ultimate-guide-to-lasemd-ultra?srsltid=AfmBOooVPREVn_DRaUFRQlWxttzttElFwf84qtBj5Yoeq5Uom9Fdumoj
[8] – https://www.pulselightclinic.co.uk/lasemd-treatment
[9] – https://www.rodeoderm.com/10-skin-concerns-that-lasemd-ultra-addresses-better-than-other-treatments/
[10] – https://www.drjaneclinic.com/post/acne-scar-laser-treatment-the-power-of-lasemd-ultra?srsltid=AfmBOopb-fVifYPSQ1OG2WxwE53d6OJXNTwn1uUP0HpcT6N49JOlsXfq
[11] – https://saintsavant.com/facials-skin/acne-scar-treatment/
[12] – https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10777097/
[13] – https://kintsuspa.com/lutronic-lasemd-ultra/
[14] – https://www.michelegreenmd.com/post-laser-hyperpigmentation
[15] – https://www.lutronic.com/us/provider/product-line/lasemd-ultra/
[16] – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38558661/
[17] – https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4445894/
[18] – https://www.michelegreenmd.com/acne-scar-removal-costs
[19] – https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jocd.15276
[20] – https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10835023/

 

Scroll to Top